主题：可持续运营管理理论与实践
主讲人：重庆大学金旻月研究员
主持人：英国威廉希尔公司张汉鹏教授
时间：2021年5月21日（星期五）14:00-15:00
直播平台及会议ID：腾讯会议 会议ID：405 173 377
主办单位：英国威廉希尔公司科研处
主讲人简介：
Dr. Minyue Jin received her Ph.D. from University of Science and Technology of China, and had been a visiting postdoc at University of California, San Diego. In 2018, she joined Chongqing University under the “One-hundred Talents Program”. Her research interests include sustainable operations and supply chain management, consumer behavior and marketing strategies. Jin has been published in numerous journals, including Manufacturing & Service Operations Management., European Journal of Operational Research, Omega, International Journal of Production Research, and International Journal of Production Economics.
金旻月，中国科学技术大学博士，加州大学圣地亚哥分校访学博士后，2018年入选重庆大学"百人计划"研究员。主要研究方向为可持续运作与供应链管理，基于消费者行为的企业营销策略。相关研究成果发表在Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, European Journal of Operational Research, Omega, International Journal of Production Research, International Journal of Production Economics等国际权威刊物。
内容提要：
We consider two competing electronic waste (e-waste) recovery channels, each of which consists of a collector and a recycler. Collectors obtain donated e-waste and sell the collected items to recyclers or in the secondary market, while recyclers process e-waste and sell the recycled material in the commodity market. Each recycler chooses for certification of one of two standards: e-Stewards or Responsible Recycling (R2). E-Stewards requires comparably more responsible handling, thus a higher processing cost, but attracts more e-waste from environmentally conscious donors. We find that Policy makers who aim to encourage e-Stewards adoption should (1) lower entry barriers for new recyclers to induce competition and (2) offer incentive programs to alleviate e-Stewards cost disadvantage, though only when recyclers have weak scale economies. Policy makers and non-governmental organizations, however, should exercise caution in endorsing e-Stewards because R2 actually may generate a higher environmental benefit because of higher recycling volumes.
随着互联网经济的快速发展，电子垃圾逐年增长，环保回收市场潜力巨大。以此为背景，我们首次在电子垃圾回收供应链中考虑二级市场、回收标准以及渠道竞争这三个要素如何交互作用影响电子垃圾回收供应链的运营模式。研究具有以下实践意义：1）多渠道竞争会激励企业选择更严格的回收标准，因此政策制定者应该鼓励竞争；2）当企业回收规模经济程度较低时，政策制定者可通过补贴措施帮助企业减少回收成本；3）当企业回收规模经济程度较低时，增加回收数量可能导致回收企业利润降低。
